<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Incomparable Maudi Darrell: One-Time Darling Of London&#8217;s Gaiety Theatre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/</link>
	<description>The #1 Archive for Musical Theater</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 19:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Krebs</title>
		<link>http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/#comment-9230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Krebs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operetta-research-center.org/?p=21654#comment-9230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sorting this out! Indeed, it&#039;s not easy to keep track of Mr Didcott&#039; names and women.

Reynolds&#039;s Newspaper, 27 May 1894, had a long report of a libel case brought by Hugh Jay Didcott (of York-road, Lambeth) against the editor of the &#039;Pelican&#039;:

‘Mr Didcott was the called and said he had been a music-hall agent for the best part of a quarter of a century, during a great portion of the time in York-road. He was sometimes known by the nickname of Mr. York Road. In the course of business a lady came to him about July or August, 1887. He obtained her engagements, and about 1891 she came to live with him as his wife, living with him till December 1893. He took a house near Gordon-square, furnishing it at his own expense, but taking it in the lady&#039;s name […]
Mr Gill then quietly rose to commence a searching, not to say scorching, cross-examination. In reply to his questions Mr Didcott said he had been known as Maurice Joseph, Hubert Jay Maurice, and Hubert Jay Didcott. His real name was Maurice Joseph, and his father&#039;s name was Jude Joseph.

 [.…] Mr Gill: Then we will try your different marriages. You were married in 1863 in the name of Maurice Joseph?—Complainant hesitated.
 Come, Mr. Didcott, you must remember something. (A laugh.) —I will answer you if you will give me time.
 But you were not married every day, were you? (Laughter.)
 The Complainant then replied that he was married again in 1865, and was divorced in 1888 on the ground of cruelty and adultery. He was not aware that the charges against him were that he had horsewhipped his wife and given her jewellery to the lady he was living with.
 He had lived with a lady in Stamford-street, but it was not necessary to mention her name any more than it was necessary to mention the name of the lady in the present case. He was again married in 1888. […]

 Cross-examination resumed. His two last wives were still living.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sorting this out! Indeed, it&#8217;s not easy to keep track of Mr Didcott&#8217; names and women.</p>
<p>Reynolds&#8217;s Newspaper, 27 May 1894, had a long report of a libel case brought by Hugh Jay Didcott (of York-road, Lambeth) against the editor of the &#8216;Pelican&#8217;:</p>
<p>‘Mr Didcott was the called and said he had been a music-hall agent for the best part of a quarter of a century, during a great portion of the time in York-road. He was sometimes known by the nickname of Mr. York Road. In the course of business a lady came to him about July or August, 1887. He obtained her engagements, and about 1891 she came to live with him as his wife, living with him till December 1893. He took a house near Gordon-square, furnishing it at his own expense, but taking it in the lady&#8217;s name […]<br />
Mr Gill then quietly rose to commence a searching, not to say scorching, cross-examination. In reply to his questions Mr Didcott said he had been known as Maurice Joseph, Hubert Jay Maurice, and Hubert Jay Didcott. His real name was Maurice Joseph, and his father&#8217;s name was Jude Joseph.</p>
<p> [.…] Mr Gill: Then we will try your different marriages. You were married in 1863 in the name of Maurice Joseph?—Complainant hesitated.<br />
 Come, Mr. Didcott, you must remember something. (A laugh.) —I will answer you if you will give me time.<br />
 But you were not married every day, were you? (Laughter.)<br />
 The Complainant then replied that he was married again in 1865, and was divorced in 1888 on the ground of cruelty and adultery. He was not aware that the charges against him were that he had horsewhipped his wife and given her jewellery to the lady he was living with.<br />
 He had lived with a lady in Stamford-street, but it was not necessary to mention her name any more than it was necessary to mention the name of the lady in the present case. He was again married in 1888. […]</p>
<p> Cross-examination resumed. His two last wives were still living.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Gänzl</title>
		<link>http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/#comment-9218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Gänzl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operetta-research-center.org/?p=21654#comment-9218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting ephemera: In the 1891 census, Diddy is sharing his home with ... Rose&#039;s mother Ellen née Jackson!!!!  I guess the latest wife had gone the way of all the other?  PS Daddy worked as Fred FOX. And sister Susan Gray FLEMING worked as Lily FOX. She became Mrs Poole (d 1915)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting ephemera: In the 1891 census, Diddy is sharing his home with &#8230; Rose&#8217;s mother Ellen née Jackson!!!!  I guess the latest wife had gone the way of all the other?  PS Daddy worked as Fred FOX. And sister Susan Gray FLEMING worked as Lily FOX. She became Mrs Poole (d 1915)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Gänzl</title>
		<link>http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/#comment-9217</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Gänzl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operetta-research-center.org/?p=21654#comment-9217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you&#039;ve set me on a day-long trail to sort this one out.And I&#039;ve done it. ROSE FOX was née Emily Rose FLEMING, daughter of Fred Fleming Liverpool last-maker who spent a decade as a comic on the halls.Mother Emma JACKSON. &#039;Rose&#039; never married MORICE-DIDCOTT so their children were illegitimate, and Maudi was registered as both Maude Didcott and Maud Flem(m)ing. In fact, a year or so after Maude&#039;s birth, MORICE married a dancer named Elizabeth BROWN(E) or ADLUM, another illegitimate sprog of another ballet-dancer ... Btw his first wife quoted four co-respondents ... invluding one well-known dancer. Seems Diddy was one of those chaps who fancied little ballet girls.
Thanks for the lead! That one had been sitting 20 years in the &#039;to do later&#039; box!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;ve set me on a day-long trail to sort this one out.And I&#8217;ve done it. ROSE FOX was née Emily Rose FLEMING, daughter of Fred Fleming Liverpool last-maker who spent a decade as a comic on the halls.Mother Emma JACKSON. &#8216;Rose&#8217; never married MORICE-DIDCOTT so their children were illegitimate, and Maudi was registered as both Maude Didcott and Maud Flem(m)ing. In fact, a year or so after Maude&#8217;s birth, MORICE married a dancer named Elizabeth BROWN(E) or ADLUM, another illegitimate sprog of another ballet-dancer &#8230; Btw his first wife quoted four co-respondents &#8230; invluding one well-known dancer. Seems Diddy was one of those chaps who fancied little ballet girls.<br />
Thanks for the lead! That one had been sitting 20 years in the &#8216;to do later&#8217; box!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Gänzl</title>
		<link>http://operetta-research-center.org/incomparable-maudi-darrell-one-time-darling-london-gaiety-theatre/#comment-9215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Gänzl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://operetta-research-center.org/?p=21654#comment-9215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hubert Jay Morice (né Morris Joseph, later Didcott)... fascinated to know where &quot;Emily Fleming&quot; came from. Didcott married Emily Mary Merryweather (1865, 2 children,divorced 1872.Did she also call herself &quot;Fleming&quot;? In any case, the Emily (born 1840, seen living with her children and parents in 1881) is surely not Rose Fox (born circa 1855 )who has just had a baby...  Mr Didcott&#039;s names and women are a bit of a puzzle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubert Jay Morice (né Morris Joseph, later Didcott)&#8230; fascinated to know where &#8220;Emily Fleming&#8221; came from. Didcott married Emily Mary Merryweather (1865, 2 children,divorced 1872.Did she also call herself &#8220;Fleming&#8221;? In any case, the Emily (born 1840, seen living with her children and parents in 1881) is surely not Rose Fox (born circa 1855 )who has just had a baby&#8230;  Mr Didcott&#8217;s names and women are a bit of a puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
